2024 County of maui hawaii v. hawaii wildlife fund

County of maui hawaii v. hawaii wildlife fund

Author: jkpz

August undefined, 2024

WebSUBJECT: Applying the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund Decision in the Clean Water Act Section 402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Program . FROM: ... Hawai’i Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, 886 F.3d 737 (9th Cir. 2024) (holding that point source discharges to groundwater that reach …

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

WebDec 8, 2024 · WASHINGTON (December 8, 2024) — Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced draft guidance that clarifies how the Supreme Court’s County of Maui v.Hawaii Wildlife Fund decision should be applied under the Clean Water Act National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program. This … WebAug 19, 2024 · The Supreme Court will render a decision soon in The County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, 881 F.3d 754 (9th Cir. 2024) case. This is a pivotal Clean Water Act case because of the potential for widespread impact, which will require permits in broader situations encompassing point sources and groundwater. joseph\u0027s fruit market windsor

EPA, Agency Deference, Hawaii Wildlife Fund v County of Maui …

WebApr 23, 2024 · The case, County of Maui v. Hawai’i Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 2024 WL 1941966, announced for the first time that an indirect addition of pollutants into surface waters requires an NPDES permit when it “is the functional equivalent of a direct discharge.” WebFeb 1, 2024 · Haw. Wildlife Fund v. Cty. of Maui, Civil No. 12-00198 SOM/BMK, 2015 WL 328227, at *5–6 (D. Haw. Jan. 23, 2015). The court acknowledged that no study confirms … WebIn County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund the question presented to the court was whether the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires a permit … joseph\u0027s goal charity

Biden Administration Presses Forward With Revised WOTUS Rule

The Supreme Court

WebJul 15, 2024 · HAWAI`I WILDLIFE FUND, a Hawaii non-profit corporation; SIERRA CLUB-MAUI GROUP, a non-profit corporation; SURFRIDER FOUNDATION, a non- ... County of Maui, ECF No. 432-3, PageID #s 10377-78. The County began discharging wastewater into Wells 1 and 2 in May 1982. It WebHe has coauthored amici briefs on behalf of environmental scientists and scientific societies in Clean Water Act cases, including as lead counsel for the amici brief filed on behalf of … joseph\u0027s furniture tillsonburg ontarioWebApr 28, 2024 · The issue in County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, one which had long divided the lower courts, was this: everyone agrees that the Clean Water Act regulates, … joseph\u0027s flooring winslow maine

"A ruling that favored the county of Maui could potentially allow wastewater dischargers to simply modify how their wastewater is discharged with minimal cost to avoid EPA's regulations, while a ruling favoring the Wildlife Fund could leave many smaller property owners, including home owners, at fault for … See more County of Maui v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund, No. 18-260, 590 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case involving pollution discharges under the Clean Water Act (CWA). The case asked whether the Clean … See more The Clean Water Act (CWA), enacted in 1972 as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, regulates water pollution into "waters of the United States." … See more The county appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which also ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in 2024. The Ninth Circuit's decision drew on Rapanos v. United States (2006), in which the plurality decision authored by Justice Antonin Scalia suggested that permits would be required … See more The Court issued its 6–3 decision on April 23, 2024, which vacated the Ninth Circuit's decision and remanded the case to the lower court. Majority opinion … See more In 2012, several environmental activist groups, including the Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Surfrider Foundation, the Sierra Club-Maui Group, and the West Maui Preservation … See more The County filed its petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court, arguing that the test proposed by the Ninth Circuit for defining a point source discharge conflicted with the Supreme Court's prior ruling in South Florida Water Management District v. Miccosukee Tribe See more Breyer instructed the Ninth on remand to consider the "functional equivalent" test, in guidance with the EPA, to re-evaluate the discharge from the Lahaina Wastewater Reclamation Facility and for similar cases going forward, barring a change in the CWA statute from … See more " - County of maui hawaii v. hawaii wildlife fund

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

EPA, Agency Deference, Hawaii Wildlife Fund v County of Maui …

County of maui hawaii v. hawaii wildlife fund

Did you know?